G2i
Staff Software Engineer (AI Evals)
Remote · Full-time · United States
- Compensation
- $100 – $200
- Category
- LLM applications
- Employment
- Full-time
- Workplace
- Remote
Technologies
TypeScript
Python
About the role
Staff Software Engineer (AI Evals)Contract | $100–$200/hour | 20-40 hrs/week | Start ASAP We’re looking for highly experienced software engineer to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such
- Staff Software Engineer (AI Evals)
- Contract | $100–$200/hour | 20-40 hrs/week | Start ASAP
- We’re looking for highly experienced software engineer to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.
- This is not a traditional engineering role.
- You won’t be writing production code.
- You’ll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.
- What This Role Actually Is
- You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios — focusing on:
- Whether the response makes sense
- Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful
- Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment
- Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer
- This role is about engineering taste — not syntax correctness.
- What You’ll Be Doing
- Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end-to-end
- Judge whether outputs are:
- Useful
- Correct (at a high level)
- Aligned with how a strong engineer would think
- Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning , not just code
- Distinguish between different levels of response quality (e.g. what makes something a 2 vs 4 )
- Provide clear, opinionated feedback on:
- What worked
- What didn’t
- What felt “off” or misleading
- Help define what great looks like when interacting with tools like Cursor
- What We Mean by “Taste”
- We’re specifically looking for engineers who can answer questions like:
- Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?
- Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?
- Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?
- Would this interaction build or erode trust?
- You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments .
- Who You Are
- Staff / Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)
- Strong background in one of the below:
- Go
- Python
- Rust
- TypeScript / JavaScript